It’s no secret that the first part Just CAUSE it was dull, monotonous and generally did not impress many people. The authors came up with interesting ideas, but failed to develop them properly. It was a project that literally demanded from us to entertain himself on his own, while he himself rejected only cloned missions. And now four years later went to the shelves Just Cause 2. The graphics were prettier, the old ideas have developed … And the claims are all the same. However, about everything in order. On the air Stopgame.ru-video review of one of the most ambitious GTA-shaped games of recent years.
Just Cause 2
The best comments
The game of a mega-bomb. The mulberry gameplay is simply roofing without exaggeration, the graphics are very cool for such an open world, the plot is not so hot, the briefing of each mission sets a decent incentive to play. Some tasks are simply done at the level of some MW2, taking into account only the fact that we are doing everything, and do not observe a scribbled video. Humor in the game is also on top, there were many points when it was really funny. One of the examples of this humor itself is the news of the Panau Island (on which the game unfolds) that we hear according to the PDA, and the game has a lot of reasons to laugh in gameplay scenes. We can use a hook to draw any two items, and believe me, the combinations are just a lot. For example, clamp a statue with a car, then with the help of this very machine to dump the statue, to attach for example its head and ride, the benefit of a physicist in the game is sane and everything looks believable, although this word can be attributed to the game with difficulty. Honor and praise to the developers for not striving for extreme realism, otherwise the gameplay would not be so unique and stunning.
To: darkh The most pleasant that I noticed while I read the comments (I seem the only one who always read them absolutely everything) is the activity of the author of the text on the forum, all the authors would be in contact with us so often. =) Well, now about the actual review. The review was really nice to listen, not because [quote] this is how [/quote], and not [quote] because we are cool [/quote] but because [quote] nya![/quote] Yes, yes, that’s it ^ The most important thing. Well, the text of the author and the personal thoughts of Gleb also play a big role. For some reason, you wanted to attribute the principle of a proverb (or saying (decide for yourself)) "How you call the ship – so it will swim.", Only here "How to write a text (Andrney) – so they will read it (Gleb)" Well, now about your mess with Sandbox. Well, what for us to entertain us there? After all, it is just the same as in life. Children come to
http://jazbaatdill.com/heart-touching-quotes/
play the sandbox and do not wait for the scripts to work. But come and begin to invent themselves. They want a lock to build.. they want to do some kind of dregs do. they want everything to hell. and comparison with GTA4 is a little inappropriate. There is some limitations in actions. And here is the awesome zodor archipelago, where you can already turn around much more recklessly. would be a working tower))) p.S. Damn another healthy comment. The question for the editors and not only. I am not in vain strain and print such comments? X)
To: [Strong] Goddima [/Strong] Graphics is excellent, no dispute. I just do not see the point of bowing to this game in the legs. First of all, this is a militant, it should have a cool gameplay in it. And he is cool here only for those who have a desire to blow up and look for something. We praised agency missions if you notice. Further – how does the game justify the fact that it is Sandbox? The GTA IV you mentioned turned out to be an excellent Sandbox, where there were interesting missions (by the way, there was constant access, so there was no need to entertain yourself) and a cool city that was drawn to explore. Here is not. As for the minuses – we said about the wretched simulation of life in the article, in the video it is not necessary to show this. The same applies to the bugs that I, however, did not notice, and poor localization. Well, the weather is rapidly changing – this is generally clean water flavor. On this "argument" I can just answer that the speed of weather change completely arranged me. I think the dispute can be finished on this. [IMG] http: // forum.Stopgame.ru/images/smiles/smile.GIF [/IMG]
To: [strong] Goddima [/barong] technologies can and move (although the schedules in shooters are better than in Crysis_e 2007 a couple), but the graphics in this tropical paradise is not so technological.For some reason, other, more technological, games on XP are placed.And here the pioneers in the form of Avalanche Studios were found, Microsoft decided to do a service, but at the same time, the cuts will lose many people on the PC because of this decision.
[url = javaScript: inds (‘darkh’);] to: darkh [/url] and we did not argue. D judging by your "response" Argument, the game tastes. If you did not know, the most players in GTA 4 are not a mission, but plays in his pleasure, t.e. fool. Just CAUSE 2 is no exception. And the point of comparing the territory of GTA 4 and Just CAUSE 2? GTA 4 is a piece of land, where they have been stuffed with all the most interesting, which they could only, and JC2 is a huge territory, where both land and huge water spaces. It is also interesting to exhaust, for example, small islands, so that suddenly there is something interesting there. And the choice is already for the players – that who is more to their liking. Bagov, by the way, is full in the game. There were even more demo versions, in full fixed, but not everything. P.S. How could you notice the localization? A lot of players complain about an uninchronized voice acting! Yes, and how it is voiced. [url = javaScript: into (‘Promasterdan’);] to: PROMASTERDAN [/url] I agree with the service "Melko -salt" and the loss of PC users, but how else? You still need to promote technology. In addition to products from "Melkosoft" There are also video cards that users buy and want to squeeze everything that the video card is capable of. Users must themselves realize that the XP, although it is holding, is worth trying something best. Crysis was (and there) was "heavy" game, so leaving only DirectX 10 would be stupid.
To: Aimka on the batler?Honestly, there is little in common.Rico just as successfully looks a little like the same Al Pachino in 40 years.
I did not play the game, but the review, as always, pleases the eye, or you can please say what kind of muza plays at the beginning)?
To: [Strong] psixotrop94 [/Strong] oh, the list of songs is at the end of all the videos, watch to the end, please.
No comment